Use AI Reviews

Summary: I used Use AI for product naming sessions. Seeing multiple outputs side by side was fun and actually helped pick the final name.

Positive: Having three models generate ideas in parallel sparked creativity and gave me diverse angles to consider.

Negative: I’d like a way to collapse or group responses when there are too many on screen.

Summary: I executed logical proofs and code verification. The quality of the reasoning was great and spared me from later debugging.

Positive: Having access to heavy reasoning models such as claude opus and deepseek r1 was beneficial for complicated logic work.

Negative: Some of the advanced models take slightly longer to load in – a progress bar would be comforting.

Summary: All of my weekly content planning was managed in Use AI. Everything stayed tidy, and I did not need to copy-paste between tools.

Positive: All interactions between models remain neatly grouped together, with no tabbing between tabs and programs required for task management.

Negative: Consider adding a quick search bar for older conversations for a quick way to find older results.

Summary: While participating in a design sprint, I uploaded a UI image and got actionable feedback. The feedback allowed my team to address layout problems before shipping.

Positive: Visual input feedback assisted me in addressing a design problem instantly by enabling me to upload a screenshot and get recommendations.

Negative: It would be helpful to enable multiple image uploads at once for batch analysis.

Summary: I was drafting documentation and needed different strengths from each model. Being able to hop between them quickly kept me productive and reduced downtime.

Positive: Switching between openai, anthropic, and google models took seconds and didn’t lose conversation context.

Negative: Would be nice to see provider speeds displayed in advance to choose the fastest one.

Summary: When drafting a legal summary, comparing claude opus with gpt 4 responses side by side helped me choose the more precise version quickly.

Positive: Live model comparison let me pick the most logical answer without guessing. This saved rework time and kept projects moving.

Negative: Would love a way to favorite models so I can find my top ones faster next time.

Summary: I tested translations for a multilingual newsletter. Use AI handled tone and context properly, and the readers said it felt natural in each language.

Positive: Loved that I could switch between english, spanish, and french in the same chat. Responses were fluent and contextually correct.

Negative: I wish the language switch button were closer to the chat box for quicker access.

Summary: I tried the voice-enabled command feature during a team call to draft notes. It kept up with me well, and I barely had to edit the output afterward.

Positive: Being able to speak prompts directly instead of typing them was surprisingly useful. It made brainstorming sessions flow better and felt natural.

Negative: Could use a short delay option so the system waits a moment before transcribing my voice input.

Summary: Writing marketing copy was faster because I could jump between models and keep all responses organized. The clean workspace is exactly what I needed.

Positive: The minimalist interface helps me focus on the task. Multi-LLM access made comparing responses between models straightforward.

Negative: Would like a dark mode toggle in a more prominent spot so I don’t have to dig through settings.

Summary: I used Use AI for a week while working on a research summary. Switching between models mid-chat felt seamless and saved me from restarting prompts. The experience was smooth, and the centralized workspace really cut down on distractions.

Positive: Loved how quickly I could swap between gpt-4, claude opus, and gemini without losing context. The unified interface kept everything neat and saved time.

Negative: It would be great to have more visible indicators for when a model is temporarily slow or down so I know before switching.

Summary: All in all, I couldn't help but conclude that it's a decent product. Having used it for purposes of coding on different occasions, I really enjoyed the extremely seamless context handoff when I chose to experiment using another model.

Positive: The layout design is very practical, and I really enjoy the idea of the use of the single workspace. In regards to changing models during the middle of the conversation, it all runs smoothly without any problems at all.

Negative: Certain buttons sometimes feel just too small when navigating using a mobile device – it would be great if there could be just ever so marginally bigger touch targets applied.

Summary: Overall good tool, but it took me a few tries to figure out the optimal flow. Once I got it, I was able to compare GPT-4 and DeepSeek results quickly.

Positive: Having access to many AI models in one place is helpful. I liked being able to switch providers and compare outputs side by side.

Negative: Took me some time to understand how to best use model comparison – maybe an onboarding guide could help new users.