OpenText Functional Testing Description

OpenText Functional Testing offers a comprehensive, AI-enhanced test automation platform designed to accelerate end-to-end functional and regression testing across diverse enterprise environments. It supports over 200 GUI and API technologies, enabling testing for desktop, web, mobile, mainframe, composite, and packaged applications from a single platform. AI-powered features, including machine learning and advanced OCR, improve object recognition accuracy and simplify test creation and maintenance. The solution supports cross-browser coverage, allowing users to script once and replay tests across leading browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, and Internet Explorer. Parallel test execution boosts efficiency by running multiple tests simultaneously across different environments, while seamless CI/CD integration enables faster feedback loops. OpenText Functional Testing fosters team collaboration with reusable actions that can be shared across projects. The platform integrates within a DevOps-enabled toolchain to eliminate bottlenecks and improve delivery speed. This comprehensive approach helps businesses ensure software quality while accelerating release cycles.

OpenText Functional Testing Alternatives
NeoLoad Reviews
NeoLoad
(369 Ratings)
Software for continuous performance testing to automate API load and application testing. For complex applications, you can design code-free performance tests. Script performance tests in automated pipelines for API test. You can design, maintain, and run performance tests in code. Then analyze the results within continuous integration pipelines with pre-packaged plugins for CI/CD tools or the NeoLoad API. You can quickly create test scripts for large, complex applications with a graphical user interface. This allows you to skip the tedious task of manually coding new or updated tests. SLAs can be defined based on the built-in monitoring metrics. To determine the app's performance, put pressure on it and compare SLAs with server-level statistics. Automate pass/fail triggers using SLAs. Contributes to root cause analysis. Automatic test script updates make it easier to update test scripts. For easy maintenance, update only the affected part of the test and re-use any remaining.
Learn more
MuukTest Reviews
MuukTest
(29 Ratings)
You know that you could be testing more to catch bugs earlier, but QA testing can take a lot of time, effort and resources to do it right. MuukTest can get growing engineering teams up to 95% coverage of end-to-end tests in just 3 months. Our QA experts create, manage, maintain, and update E2E tests on the MuukTest Platform for your web, API, and mobile apps at record speed. We begin exploratory and negative tests after achieving 100% regression coverage within 8 weeks to uncover bugs and increase coverage. The time you spend on development is reduced by managing your testing frameworks, scripts, libraries and maintenance. We also proactively identify flaky tests and false test results to ensure the accuracy of your tests. Early and frequent testing allows you to detect errors in the early stages your development lifecycle. This reduces the burden of technical debt later on.
Learn more
Parasoft Reviews
Parasoft
(125 Ratings)
Parasoft's mission is to provide automated testing solutions and expertise that empower organizations to expedite delivery of safe and reliable software. A powerful unified C and C++ test automation solution for static analysis, unit testing and structural code coverage, Parasoft C/C++test helps satisfy compliance with industry functional safety and security requirements for embedded software systems.
Learn more
QA Wolf Reviews
QA Wolf
(187 Ratings)
QA Wolf helps engineering teams achieve 80% automated test coverage end-to-end in just four months. Here's an overview of what you get in the box, whether it's 100 or 100,000 tests. • Automated end-to-end testing for 80% of the user flows in 4 months. The tests are written in Playwright, an open-source tool (no vendor lock-in; you own the code). • Test matrix and outline in the AAA framework. • Unlimited parallel testing on any environment of your choice. • We host and maintain 100% parallel-run infrastructure. • Maintenance of flaky and broken test for 24 hours. • Guaranteed 100% reliable results -- zero flakes. • Human-verified bugs sent via your messaging app as a bug report. • CI/CD Integration with your deployment pipelines and issue trackers. • Access to full-time QA Engineers at QA Wolf 24 hours a day.
Learn more

Pricing

Free Trial:
Yes

Integrations

View Integrations

Reviews - 1 Verified Review

Total
ease
features
design
support
See More Reviews Write a Review

Company Details

Company:
OpenText
Year Founded:
1991
Headquarters:
Canada
Website:
www.opentext.com/products/functional-testing
Update This Listing

Media

OpenText Functional Testing Screenshot 1
OpenText Functional Testing Screenshot 1 OpenText Functional Testing Screenshot 2
Recommended Products
Our Free Plans just got better! | Auth0 Icon
Our Free Plans just got better! | Auth0

With up to 25k MAUs and unlimited Okta connections, our Free Plan lets you focus on what you do best—building great apps.

You asked, we delivered! Auth0 is excited to expand our Free and Paid plans to include more options so you can focus on building, deploying, and scaling applications without having to worry about your security. Auth0 now, thank yourself later.
Try free now

Product Details

Platforms
Web-Based
Types of Training
Training Docs
Customer Support
Business Hours

OpenText Functional Testing Features and Options

Functional Testing Tool

Automated Testing
Interface Testing
Regression Testing
Reporting / Analytics
Sanity Testing
Smoke Testing
System Testing
Unit Testing

Automated Testing Software

Hierarchical View
Move & Copy
Parameterized Testing
Requirements-Based Testing
Security Testing
Supports Parallel Execution
Test Script Reviews
Unicode Compliance

API Testing Tool

Functional Testing
Fuzz Testing
Load Testing
Penetration Testing
Runtime and Error Detection
Security Testing
UI Testing
Validation Testing

Software Testing Tool

Automated Testing
Black-Box Testing
Dynamic Testing
Issue Tracking
Manual Testing
Quality Assurance Planning
Reporting / Analytics
Static Testing
Test Case Management
Variable Testing Methods
White-Box Testing

OpenText Functional Testing Lists

OpenText Functional Testing User Reviews

Write a Review
  • Name: Jeff G.
    Job Title: Test lead
    Length of product use: 6-12 Months
    Used How Often?: Daily
    Role: User
    Organization Size: 20,000 or More
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    UFT One

    Date: Aug 28 2023

    Summary: Overall I think UFT one is one of the best tools out there. When looking at tools. Remember QA\Test are the last line of defense before the product goes out the door. When I hear this software is free or cheaper. It makes me wonder what are they think! The last place you want to be cheap is in testing of your product. You have to ask yourself are you doing what is needed to get the best product out the door. When you look for a automation tool you should look for the best tool out there not the cheapest. You want a tool that can do as much as possible in 1 tool. You want a tool that Tester can learn easily and can maintain easily. I think that is this tool UFT one. I have gotten Tester with no programming background and are over 40 years old automation script with 2 days. Note just like anything to master something takes time.

    Positive: 1) AI based Testing (very easy to use)
    2) Mobile testing (For note this sites says it doe not support which it does)
    3) Automation Object Model
    4) It does support the following : .NET 5 and 6 AG Grid, AutoPass, Bamboo , Delphi, Java (Oracle Java SE 19, OpenJDK 19, Zulu OpenJDK, Microsoft Office, Microsoft 365, SAP, Stingray, JAVA
    5) I do like how you have different ways to attack automation, you can use code using VB script, you can record & Play, you can use spy object, you can use AI script, you can use images... etc.

    Negative: It is a resource hog.

    They should improve performance. There will be performance degradation on the test environment due to long continuous executions of automation scripts which leads to inconsistency of results, a better way to resolve this problem should be addressed at some point.

    Read More...
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next