BitBar Description

Experience the ultimate in flexibility with a cloud-based mobile app testing solution that allows you to leverage any framework for both manual and automated testing on a vast array of real devices. With no limits on users or concurrency, this solution effortlessly integrates with your current CI/CD tools and processes. The landscape of software development has undergone a significant transformation, making Continuous Testing and Continuous Delivery critical yet challenging for many developers. Modern development teams are required to be agile, adaptable, and efficient to provide enhanced software experiences to users as quickly as possible. You can continue using your favorite processes, IDEs, and CI/CD tools while retaining the freedom to switch to any other tools or frameworks available on the market. Enjoy unlimited user access and concurrency on thousands of actual devices and browsers, and easily scale your testing capabilities as needed. This platform offers native compatibility with any DevOps environment, including Jenkins, Gradle, JIRA, Slack, TeamCity, and Travis, and it also features a robust REST API for seamless integration with your preferred tools or services. This adaptability ensures that your testing processes remain efficient and aligned with your team's evolving needs.

BitBar Alternatives
QA Wolf Reviews
QA Wolf
(185 Ratings)
QA Wolf helps engineering teams achieve 80% automated test coverage end-to-end in just four months. Here's an overview of what you get in the box, whether it's 100 or 100,000 tests. • Automated end-to-end testing for 80% of the user flows in 4 months. The tests are written in Playwright, an open-source tool (no vendor lock-in; you own the code). • Test matrix and outline in the AAA framework. • Unlimited parallel testing on any environment of your choice. • We host and maintain 100% parallel-run infrastructure. • Maintenance of flaky and broken test for 24 hours. • Guaranteed 100% reliable results -- zero flakes. • Human-verified bugs sent via your messaging app as a bug report. • CI/CD Integration with your deployment pipelines and issue trackers. • Access to full-time QA Engineers at QA Wolf 24 hours a day.
Learn more
Sahi Pro Reviews
Sahi Pro
(60 Ratings)
Sahi Pro is a suite automation tools for web, Web-services, Windows desktop and Java applications. Sahi Pro features include automatic waits, recorders and accessor spy, inbuilt frame and editor, parallel playback, automatic reporting, automatic logging, and reporting. Also, Sahi Pro can save 70% of the time and effort that is normally spent on test automation. Sahi Pro has been trusted by more than 400 companies around the world and is quickly becoming the preferred tool for test automation in the agile world.
Learn more
Global App Testing Reviews
Global App Testing
(48 Ratings)
Global App Testing (GAT) allows tech teams to test in over 189 countries with over 60,000+ professional testers who use real devices and environments. Enhance your testing process and increase release quality and speed whilst improving budget efficiency via the GAT platform, which is fully integrated to work seamlessly with your existing DevOps or CI/CD tools. Whether you are looking for full time QA support, or to manage spikes in your release cycles, the GAT integration-led approach empowers you to manage your entire testing workflow from test launch to results analysis without leaving your existing tooling (such as Github, Jira, Testrail etc). Through our integrated platform, we enable unscripted exploratory testing and scripted functional test case execution to be embedded within your CI/CD and SDLC processes, providing the perfect synergy with your automation testing tools. Test results are returned in real time. Start receiving results in as little as 15 minutes with a full bug report delivered within a few hours, enabling quick feedback on critical issues and edge cases.
Learn more
NeoLoad Reviews
NeoLoad
(369 Ratings)
Software for continuous performance testing to automate API load and application testing. For complex applications, you can design code-free performance tests. Script performance tests in automated pipelines for API test. You can design, maintain, and run performance tests in code. Then analyze the results within continuous integration pipelines with pre-packaged plugins for CI/CD tools or the NeoLoad API. You can quickly create test scripts for large, complex applications with a graphical user interface. This allows you to skip the tedious task of manually coding new or updated tests. SLAs can be defined based on the built-in monitoring metrics. To determine the app's performance, put pressure on it and compare SLAs with server-level statistics. Automate pass/fail triggers using SLAs. Contributes to root cause analysis. Automatic test script updates make it easier to update test scripts. For easy maintenance, update only the affected part of the test and re-use any remaining.
Learn more

Pricing

Pricing Starts At:
$39 per month
Pricing Information:
or $29 per month billed annually
Free Trial:
Yes

Integrations

API:
Yes, BitBar has an API
View Integrations

Reviews - 1 Verified Review

Total
ease
features
design
support
See More Reviews Write a Review

Company Details

Company:
SmartBear
Year Founded:
2009
Headquarters:
United States
Website:
bitbar.com

Media

BitBar Screenshot 1
BitBar Screenshot 1
Recommended Products
Our Free Plans just got better! | Auth0 Icon
Our Free Plans just got better! | Auth0

With up to 25k MAUs and unlimited Okta connections, our Free Plan lets you focus on what you do best—building great apps.

You asked, we delivered! Auth0 is excited to expand our Free and Paid plans to include more options so you can focus on building, deploying, and scaling applications without having to worry about your security. Auth0 now, thank yourself later.
Try free now

Product Details

Platforms
Web-Based
iPhone App
iPad App
Android App
Types of Training
Training Docs
Customer Support
Online Support

BitBar Features and Options

Automated Testing Software

Hierarchical View
Move & Copy
Parameterized Testing
Requirements-Based Testing
Security Testing
Supports Parallel Execution
Test Script Reviews
Unicode Compliance

Mobile App Testing Tool

Functional Testing
Installation Testing
Interruption Testing
Memory Testing
Performance Testing
Usability Testing

Functional Testing Tool

Automated Testing
Interface Testing
Regression Testing
Reporting / Analytics
Sanity Testing
Smoke Testing
System Testing
Unit Testing

BitBar User Reviews

Write a Review
  • Name: Anonymous (Verified)
    Job Title: Graphic and Web Designer
    Length of product use: 6-12 Months
    Used How Often?: Monthly
    Role: User
    Organization Size: 1 - 25
    Features
    Design
    Ease
    Pricing
    Support
    Likelihood to Recommend to Others
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Frustrating to use for testing websites

    Date: Jun 01 2023

    Summary: Annoying and cumbersome. Sort of gets the job done but would be happier if I didn't have to 'take it from the top' to navigate the several repeat steps to return to the same device list again.

    Positive: Many device/OS testing options in Desktop, IOS and Android versions. The audio prompt when website is displaying in target device and ready to be tested is convenient.

    Negative: The UI is not intuitive or convenient. For example, if one has navigated to a particular iOS version which has a list of available devices that you are testing—after testing one device (such as iPhone 12 Pro Max just as an example), and concluding that particular test—you have to go all the way back to re-set up what you want to test: Navigate back to 'Start a Browser Live Test', re-select 'iOS' from 'Desktop, iOS and Android' menu, re-select the target iOS version from the drop down. re-select location (EU or US) then scroll to select a device from the same list of devices you are working with, and even have to re-paste the url of the website you are testing. If only you could return to the device options for all that same criteria to just get to the device list without having to navigate through all the choices again! Very annoying. As well, there is a lot of drop-downs and scrolling to navigate through the selection criteria as the window is not very large. CrossBrowerTesting was so much easier and quicker to use.
    Second complaint: it seems like 1/3 of the time, the desired device to check does not make a connection to the video feed, is locked, device not connected to the internet, or other number of strange screens/notices display instead of the just showing the website you want to test.

    Read More...
  • Previous
  • You're on page 1
  • Next