Compare Mayhem Code Security vs. OWASP WSFuzzer

Every minute, a multitude of autonomously generated tests is executed to identify vulnerabilities and facilitate swift remediation. Mayhem eliminates uncertainty surrounding untested code by autonomously creating test suites that yield practical outcomes. There is no requirement to recompile the code, as Mayhem operates seamlessly with dockerized images. Its self-learning machine learning technology continuously executes thousands of tests each second, searching for crashes and defects, allowing developers to concentrate on enhancing features. Background continuous testing detects new defects and expands code coverage effectively. For each defect identified, Mayhem provides a detailed reproduction and backtrace, prioritizing them according to your risk assessment. Users can view all results, organized and prioritized based on immediate needs for fixes. Mayhem integrates effortlessly into your existing development tools and build pipeline, granting developers access to actionable insights regardless of the programming language or tools utilized by the team. This adaptability ensures that teams can maintain their workflow without disruption while enhancing their code quality.

Fuzz testing, commonly referred to as fuzzing, is a technique used in software testing that aims to discover implementation errors by injecting malformed or semi-malformed data in an automated way. For example, consider a scenario involving an integer variable within a program that captures a user's selection among three questions; the user's choice can be represented by the integers 0, 1, or 2, resulting in three distinct cases. Since integers are typically stored as fixed-size variables, a failure to implement the default switch case securely could lead to program crashes and various traditional security vulnerabilities. Fuzzing serves as an automated method for uncovering software implementation issues, enabling the identification of bugs when they occur. A fuzzer is a specialized tool designed to automatically inject semi-random data into the program stack, aiding in the detection of anomalies. The process of generating this data involves the use of generators, while the identification of vulnerabilities often depends on debugging tools that can analyze the program's behavior under the influence of the injected data. These generators typically utilize a mixture of established static fuzzing vectors to enhance the testing process, ultimately contributing to more robust software development practices.