Compare Hatz AI vs. Liminal

Hatz AI empowers Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to establish an AI-as-a-service model utilizing tailored large language models (LLMs). This innovative platform is driven by an LLM operations engine named Mido and features a multi-tenant management system accessible via an MSP admin dashboard. By partnering with Hatz, MSPs can seamlessly incorporate AI into their services, enabling them to develop specialized AI applications and workflows tailored to their clients, along with providing organizationally managed AI assistants. Furthermore, Hatz AI facilitates the creation of a comprehensive record system for small businesses through custom LLMs and vector storage, all efficiently governed by the Hatz AI platform. By implementing our secure, organizationally managed AI chat assistant, companies can significantly reduce operational costs while increasing employee productivity tenfold. The user-friendly interface allows MSPs to design applications and utilize pre-built prompts for their clients, which can then be distributed across multiple tenants, enhancing the overall experience. This capability not only streamlines operations but also positions MSPs as leaders in AI-driven solutions.

Liminal gives regulated organizations a single governed environment for AI. Rather than securing models an organization has already deployed, Liminal supplies the access itself, so protection is applied before anything reaches a provider. Employees work with leading models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google and others through one interface, with policy-based routing and no per-provider contracts. Adding a new model becomes a policy decision rather than an integration project, and teams are never stuck waiting for procurement to catch up with what the market released. Sensitive terms are identified within each prompt and masked, redacted, flagged or blocked according to rules defined by data category rather than by department. Masked values are restored in the response, which keeps output usable while regulated information stays inside the organization. Employees never have to sanitize inputs by hand, which is what makes the governed path the one they actually choose. Administrators see who used which model, what rules were applied and where violations occurred. That record is generated at the time of the interaction, so audit requests are answered from existing evidence instead of reconstruction after the fact. Activity can be fed into existing security tooling and reviewed alongside other events rather than in isolation. The platform connects to internal systems through MCP, so employees bring organizational context into their work without moving data into tools nobody is watching. Access follows permissions that already exist. Deployments run on single-tenant infrastructure with SSO and role-based permissions, serving banking and credit unions, insurance, healthcare, education, state and local government, and life sciences.