Compare FortiSandbox vs. ThreatLocker

In contrast to earlier viruses that were relatively simple and few in number, traditional antivirus solutions could adequately safeguard systems using a database of signatures. However, the landscape of modern malware has evolved, incorporating advanced techniques like exploiting vulnerabilities. When a weakness in a trusted application is exploited, it can lead to unexpected behavior, which attackers leverage to breach computer security. This method of attacking through an undisclosed software vulnerability is referred to as a zero-day attack, or 0-day attack, and prior to the adoption of sandboxing, effective prevention methods were lacking. A malware sandbox serves as a protective mechanism that restricts an application's operations, such as handling a Word document, within a controlled environment. This isolated space allows the sandbox to scrutinize the dynamic behaviors of applications and their interactions in a simulated user setting, thereby revealing any potential malicious activities. Such technology has become essential in the fight against sophisticated threats, ensuring a more comprehensive approach to cybersecurity.

ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform provides extensive application control with features like ring-fencing and selective elevation, ensuring meticulous execution management. Offering learning mode and extensive support, it integrates threat detection and activity monitoring to enhance compliance, reduce costs, and bolster cybersecurity through alerts and approvals. Despite its strengths, there are areas for improvement in training flexibility, policy updates, and interface enhancements, along with challenges in handling non-digitally signed software. Deployed across environments, it works well with existing cybersecurity instruments for real-time threat prevention.