Average Ratings 0 Ratings
Average Ratings 0 Ratings
Description
Evaluator assists in making informed decisions by systematically comparing various alternatives against a unified set of criteria. For instance, when choosing a vendor's product or service, factors like features, pricing, and availability are taken into account. Each alternative receives a score based on these criteria, allowing for straightforward comparison among all options. The significance of each criterion can be adjusted through weighting, which modifies its effect on the total evaluation score. This tool also allows for collaborative input, where multiple individuals can contribute their scores, resulting in a consolidated scorecard that reflects the group's collective assessment. The outcomes of this evaluation can be displayed in different formats and compiled into a comprehensive report. Additionally, it is possible to establish a scorecard baseline at any time for auditing purposes. Users can create scorecard templates derived from pre-existing evaluation criteria, facilitating rapid development of new scorecards tailored for evaluating alternative options using the same benchmarks. Furthermore, it is essential to assign a weight to each criterion according to its importance in the decision-making process to ensure balanced evaluations.
Description
Created for personal use by a Request for Proposal (RFP) Project Manager, the RFP Evaluation Team Software, developed in Microsoft Access, is currently undergoing Beta Testing. Users can input ratings and feedback into the system independently and at any point leading up to the meeting. This allows Evaluation Team Meetings to concentrate on business issues that exhibit discrepancies in ratings or have specific comments from team members. The Software generates a Weighted Cross-Referenced Evaluation Criteria, allowing for mathematical calculations that categorize Business Issues into Major and Minor segments. Additionally, team members have the option to bypass topics outside their area of expertise. The system intelligently computes weights based on the rated issues and the number of team members who assessed each issue, ensuring a fair and balanced evaluation process. This innovative tool aims to streamline the evaluation process, fostering more productive discussions during meetings.
API Access
Has API
No
API Access
Has API
No
Integrations
Mimasa AI
No
Pricing Details
No price information available.
Free Trial
No
Free Version
Yes
Pricing Details
No price information available.
Free Trial
No
Free Version
No
Deployment
Web-Based
Yes
On-Premises
No
iPhone App
No
iPad App
No
Android App
No
Windows
No
Mac
No
Linux
No
Chromebook
No
Deployment
Web-Based
No
On-Premises
No
iPhone App
No
iPad App
No
Android App
No
Windows
Yes
Mac
No
Linux
No
Chromebook
No
Customer Support
Business Hours
Yes
Live Rep (24/7)
No
Online Support
Yes
Customer Support
Business Hours
Yes
Live Rep (24/7)
No
Online Support
Yes
Types of Training
Training Docs
Yes
Webinars
No
Live Training (Online)
No
In Person
No
Types of Training
Training Docs
Yes
Webinars
No
Live Training (Online)
No
In Person
No
Vendor Details
Company Name
Midrig
Country
United Kingdom
Website
midrig.com/evaluator/
Vendor Details
Company Name
Technical Acquisition Specialists
Website
www.rfpteammanager.com
Product Features
Decision Support
Application Development
No
Budgeting & Forecasting
No
Data Analysis
Yes
Decision Tree Analysis
No
Monte Carlo Simulation
No
Performance Metrics
No
Rules-Based Workflow
No
Sensitivity Analysis
No
Thematic Mapping
No
Version Control
No
Product Features
Proposal Management
Automatic Formatting
No
Calendar Management
No
Collaboration
No
Contact Management
No
Content Repository
No
Document Management
No
Electronic Signature
No
Knowledge Library
No
Pipeline Management
No
RFP Management
Yes
Requirements Management
Yes
Revision Management
No
Task Management
No
Templates
No
Version Control
No