Average Ratings 0 Ratings
Average Ratings 0 Ratings
Description
Evaluator assists in making informed decisions by systematically comparing various alternatives against a unified set of criteria. For instance, when choosing a vendor's product or service, factors like features, pricing, and availability are taken into account. Each alternative receives a score based on these criteria, allowing for straightforward comparison among all options. The significance of each criterion can be adjusted through weighting, which modifies its effect on the total evaluation score. This tool also allows for collaborative input, where multiple individuals can contribute their scores, resulting in a consolidated scorecard that reflects the group's collective assessment. The outcomes of this evaluation can be displayed in different formats and compiled into a comprehensive report. Additionally, it is possible to establish a scorecard baseline at any time for auditing purposes. Users can create scorecard templates derived from pre-existing evaluation criteria, facilitating rapid development of new scorecards tailored for evaluating alternative options using the same benchmarks. Furthermore, it is essential to assign a weight to each criterion according to its importance in the decision-making process to ensure balanced evaluations.
Description
The Decisions API is designed to transform both text and images into structured decisions that applications can utilize, processing inputs approximately ten times faster than the Responses API. Developers must provide a model along with shared input evidence and one or more questions that outline the evaluation criteria, after which the API delivers organized answers suitable for tasks like content classification, request routing, work prioritization, or making decisions based on defined thresholds. It accommodates three types of questions: predicate, which assesses whether a condition holds true and yields a probability ranging from 0 to 1; choice, which chooses a single value from a predetermined set and provides the associated probabilities and confidence levels; and score, which measures an input against a set of ordered rubric levels to return a probability-weighted score. The system is versatile in that it can process inputs as plain text or as user messages that include both text and images, making it effective for evaluating various scenarios such as identifying visible product damage, determining request intent, classifying document types, assessing issue severity, or evaluating answer relevance. This capability empowers developers to create more responsive and intelligent applications tailored to user needs.
API Access
Has API
No
API Access
Has API
Yes
Pricing Details
No price information available.
Free Trial
No
Free Version
Yes
Pricing Details
No price information available.
Free Trial
No
Free Version
No
Deployment
Web-Based
Yes
On-Premises
No
iPhone App
No
iPad App
No
Android App
No
Windows
No
Mac
No
Linux
No
Chromebook
No
Deployment
Web-Based
Yes
On-Premises
No
iPhone App
No
iPad App
No
Android App
No
Windows
No
Mac
No
Linux
No
Chromebook
No
Customer Support
Business Hours
Yes
Live Rep (24/7)
No
Online Support
Yes
Customer Support
Business Hours
No
Live Rep (24/7)
No
Online Support
Yes
Types of Training
Training Docs
Yes
Webinars
No
Live Training (Online)
No
In Person
No
Types of Training
Training Docs
Yes
Webinars
No
Live Training (Online)
No
In Person
No
Vendor Details
Company Name
Midrig
Country
United Kingdom
Website
midrig.com/evaluator/
Vendor Details
Company Name
OpenAI
Founded
2015
Country
United States
Website
developers.openai.com/api/docs/guides/decisions
Product Features
Decision Support
Application Development
No
Budgeting & Forecasting
No
Data Analysis
Yes
Decision Tree Analysis
No
Monte Carlo Simulation
No
Performance Metrics
No
Rules-Based Workflow
No
Sensitivity Analysis
No
Thematic Mapping
No
Version Control
No