Compare Cython vs. Haskell

Cython serves as an optimizing static compiler designed for both the Python language and the enhanced Cython language, which is rooted in Pyrex. It simplifies the process of creating C extensions for Python, making it as straightforward as writing Python itself. With Cython, developers can harness the strengths of both Python and C, enabling seamless interactions between Python code and C or C++ code at any point. By incorporating static type declarations in a Python-like syntax, users can easily enhance the performance of their readable Python code to that of plain C. The tool also provides combined source code level debugging, allowing developers to efficiently identify issues within their Python, Cython, and C code. Cython is particularly adept at managing large datasets, such as multi-dimensional NumPy arrays, facilitating the development of applications within the expansive and robust CPython ecosystem. Notably, the Cython language extends the capabilities of Python by allowing direct calls to C functions and the declaration of C types for variables and class attributes, ultimately enhancing the development experience. This fusion of languages not only broadens the possibilities for developers but also streamlines the process of optimizing Python applications.

In Haskell, every expression possesses a type that is established during the compilation process. The types involved in function applications must align correctly; otherwise, the compiler will reject the program. This strict type system not only serves as a guarantee of correctness but also functions as a language for articulating the construction of programs. Each function in Haskell adheres to the principles of mathematical functions, meaning they are "pure" in nature. Even when dealing with side-effecting IO operations, they merely outline actions to be taken, generated by pure functions. Haskell does not utilize statements or instructions; instead, it relies solely on expressions that cannot alter variables, whether local or global, nor can they manipulate states such as time or randomness. While it is not necessary to specify every type in a Haskell program, the types can be inferred through a process of bidirectional unification. Still, programmers have the option to explicitly define types as needed or request the compiler to generate them for reference, thereby enriching documentation and enhancing clarity. This flexibility allows Haskell developers to strike a balance between type safety and ease of use.