Compare CodeSonar vs. TrustInSoft Analyzer

CodeSonar uses a unified dataflow with symbolic execution analysis to examine the entire application's computations. CodeSonar's static analyze engine is extremely deep and does not rely on pattern matching or similar approximations. It finds 3-5 times more defects than other static analysis tools. SAST tools are able to be easily integrated into any team's software development process, unlike many other tools such as testing tools and compilers. SAST technologies such as CodeSonar attach to existing build environments to add analysis information. CodeSonar works in the same way as a compiler. However, CodeSonar creates an abstraction model of your entire program, instead of creating object codes. CodeSonar's symbolic execution engine analyzes the derived model and makes connections between them.

TrustInSoft commercializes a source code analyzer called TrustInSoft Analyzer, which analyzes C and C++ code and mathematically guarantees the absence of defects, immunity of software components to the most common security flaws, and compliance with a specification. The technology is recognized by U.S. federal agency the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and was the first in the world to meet NIST’s SATE V Ockham Criteria for high quality software. The key differentiator for TrustInSoft Analyzer is its use of mathematical approaches called formal methods, which allow for an exhaustive analysis to find all the vulnerabilities or runtime errors and only raises true alarms. Companies who use TrustInSoft Analyzer reduce their verification costs by 4, efforts in bug detection by 40, and obtain an irrefutable proof that their software is safe and secure. The experts at TrustInSoft can also assist clients in training, support and additional services.